I have a friend who is. Not hard to spot these days as she’s in good company with many of those who are supposed to be pastors who are too. If you don’t consider scripture to be the inerrant Word of God (and thus above the words of anyone on this earth including the Pope!), an
d you feel that it’s been changed over the years by the multiple translations and rewritings etc, so you figure you can’t accept it as it’s provided, but would still call yourself a Christian, then you are also a fan of the “patchwork” Gospel, whether you realise it or not. Because if you feel that way, the only way you can thus read scripture is to figure that you’ll take whatever bits out of it seem to make sense to you, or which don’t offend your senses too much and leave the rest out comfortable in considering it to be errant or not how God intended it to be written – after all, Jesus “couldn’t possibly be the only way to God” and He really didn’t say “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life” but just intimated that His way was “a better way of many” (anyone recognise those statements of late from one of the most famous female icons of this decade?). Sadly she too is a fan of the “patchwork” Gospel.
My point primarily is this – IF you are that type of person who doesn’t consider scripture to be accurate in any part of it, then on what do you base your statement that you are a Christian?? You can’t say it’s because you believe in Jesus – how can you, if you can’t be sure that the portions of scripture that speak about Him are accurate. How can you trust that He is Who He said He is? And if He isn’t, then why would you want to be considered a follower? What portions of scripture do you consider are accurate – just those bits that are warm and fuzzy and talk about love?? All very well and good, but it ain’t going to get you into heaven, which is where I’m presuming you want to go? How can you trust “your” God, if you figure the half of what He tells you is wrong or do you have some other means of discerning His Will that the rest of us are missing out on perhaps? How do you decide which bits to believe and which to ignore?? How can you have any hope in the future, if you can’t trust what’s happened in the past? How big is YOUR God?? And I bet (like my friend) you then try to fill in the gaps with bits and pieces of other religions (hence the term “Patchwork” Gospel) that equally sound nice and comforting and tickle your ears and feed your need to not have to deal with anything awful like the word “sin” in your life. You know it’s there but if you can ignore it in the bible, and don’t find it mentioned in other religions then it’s easy to just pretend it’s not something you need to concern yourself with. But hey if you don’t believe in the concept of sin – then you certainly don’t need a Saviour do you?? So either stop calling yourself a Christian and instead use the proper term of “New Ager” or stop to recognise the SIN you are committing by not giving God His due and recognising His Power to ensure His Word is what He means it to be. You are in danger of blaspheming the One you may state you serve – Jesus – John stated that He IS the Word and Jesus Himself stated that His Words would be eternal which is proving true thus far – no other writings have survived as long as scripture, in the way it continues to impact the world. And the biggest difference about the Gospel message is how it challenges and changes lives in the most incredible way.
Of course, I’m SO silly for believing that God is big enough to be able
to ensure His Word says what He wants it to unto every generation, and that He can ensure its accuracy throughout. That’s not to say that there aren’t some rather nonsensical versions floating around on the scene these days, but I suspect even those, He will use to His Glory to ensure that those who are willing to search will see them for the erroneous versions they are. Ultimately we are beholden to seek Him (and not man’s version of Him) and if we truly do He will be true to HIS Word and meet us in our need and reveal Himself to us. May He open your heart to accept His Truth for what it is!
NB: Another site of interest on this topic is Truth or Fables

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 24, 2008 at 4:47 am
A Slight Delay » Blog Archive » Patchwork Christianity?
[...] post that I came across at random, this time from Ever Looking Upwards, who asks, “Are you a fan of the ‘patchwork’ Gospel??” She asserts: If you don’t consider scripture to be the inerrant Word of God (and thus above the [...]
June 7, 2008 at 10:32 pm
bro8
A very good article. Unfortunately there are too many so called Christians who pick and mix where the gospel is concerned. Once again you shot straight to the heart of the matter.
June 7, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Ha Tikvah
Aww shucks Bro – nice of you to drop by and comment LOL! Appreciated your input and nice to know you’re still reading my ramblings
. Glad it meets with your approval too!
July 5, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Neil
Excellent piece! I heard of the term Dalmatian Theology that describes this same concept. People think the Bible is inspired in spots and that they are inspired to spot the spots. That don’t say it that way, of course, but that is the net result of their Dalmatian / Patchwork theology.
May we embrace and follow the full Gospel!
Great blog – keep up the good work!
December 7, 2008 at 2:22 am
Robaigh
Sorry I haven’t been by here in a while. Quite a while, obviously.
I think you’re making a huge leap by claiming that not believing in inerrancy (of Scripture) necessarily leads to a hand-picking of sections that make sense, specifically the “warm and fuzzy,” feel-good bits.
For one thing, there’s a LOT in the Bible that doesn’t make sense to me. That doesn’t mean that I discount it or cut it out for my convenience – it just means I don’t understand it. It also doesn’t follow that I then just pick the warm and fuzzy bits. What if the warm and fuzzies are the things that don’t make sense to me? I’m just saying that a does not lead to b here.
On top of this, I know plenty of inerrancy proponents who pick and choose which aspects they will follow and which they will discard. Levitical law is a prime example that illustrates the point.
Inerrancy denies the historicity of Scripture. Just as Jesus Christ is both God and Human, Scripture is both God’s Word and Men’s work. I agree with you insofar as you say that the Scripture we have is what God intended us to have, but God gave us God’s revelation through human hands working within history. If God wanted us to have something neat and infallible, God would have given it to us out of thin air. It’s clear this did not happen.
I think the primary problem with inerrancy is that it puts God’s ability to work with, in spite of, and for the sake of humans outside of His grasp. What’s wrong with realizing and admitting the truth that the versions of the Bible that we have are translated works of men (and women), compiled from sometimes inconsistent manuscripts (and fragments of manuscripts), filled with occasional transcriptional errors, intentional alterations and disagreement in terms of translation?
This is historical fact and it is not dangerous to faith. In truth, that the Bible came to be at all is miraculous. How can you say that, because I don’t believe in inerrancy of the Bible that I don’t take it seriously as the written revelation about the eternal Word of God?
The Bible is God’s word secondarily to Jesus Christ as God’s Word. I know about Jesus because of the Bible, and so I take it very, very seriously. I just don’t worship the Bible. I don’t believe it is inerrant, but I believe it is sufficient. I don’t believe it is divine, but it is about the Divine and it points to the Divine. I don’t believe the Bible will get me into heaven, but I believe it points to the One who will.
Blessings to you in Jesus’ name.